Front | Back |
Alternatives to Social Research
|
1. Authority
2. Tradition 3. Common Sense 4. Myths 5. Personal Experience |
Quantitative vs. Qualitative
|
Quantitative: numbers eg: surverys, content analysis
Qualitative: words eg: interviews, focus groups |
Natural vs. Social Science
|
Natural: examines physical and material world
Social: studies people |
Basic vs. Applied Research
|
Basic: advances a field of knowledge
Applied: solving a specific problem eg. an outside group asks for help |
Longitudinal, Case Study & Cross Sectional
|
Longitudinal: repeated observations of the same variables over a long period of time
Case Study: intensive analysis of a specific individual unit eg. studying one single person's behaviour Cross Sectional: observing a group of people at one specific time |
Deductive vs. Inductive
|
Deductive: begin with abstract relations and move toward concrete empirical evidence
Inductive: begin with detailed observations and move toward abstract generalizations |
Paradigms: Positvist, Interpretivist, Critical
|
Paradigm: a set of assumptions, beliefs or models for doing good research (basically a way of thinking)
Positivist: natural sciences. Looking for universal law-like causal relationships governing human behaviour (QUANTITATIVE) Interpretivist: also scientific but looking to understand social phenomenon from the perspective of those who experience it (QUALITATIVE) Critical: starts with a value position that the world is conflicted and governed by hidden power. Purpose is to reveal societal injustice. Belief in gov't corruption. |
Types of Unethical Behaviour & Types of Harm
|
- Fraud, Plagiarism, Causing Harm
- Physical Harm, Psychological Abuse, Stress, Loss of Self-esteem, Legal Harm |
Research Ethics Board: Guiding Principles
|
1. respect for human dignity
2. respect for free and informed consent 3. respect for vulnerable persons 4. respect for privacy and confidentiality 5. respect for justice and inclusiveness 6. balancing harms and benefits |
The Literature Review
|
2 parts: (after defining & refining a topic)
1) read all relevant literative before doing their study 2) must present a condensed version of the lit. review highlights after study is completed and share findings with others |
Variables
|
Continuous: having an infinite number of potential values eg. age, income
Discrete: contain distinct categories eg. gender, marital status Nominal: numerical values are given as classifications, number itself has no value eg: gender (1 male/2 female) Ordinal: there is an order to the numbers but the numbers don't represent the values eg: health rating (1 unhealthy, 2 healthy, 3 very healthy) Interval/Scale: numbers represent themselves eg: age, weight, height |
Quantitative Measurements
|
Need to be reliable and valid.
Reliability: measuring instruments must be dependable and consistent to provide identical results (think of weighing yourself on a scale eg: scale reads 240 daily) Validity: measurement represents the truth (think of weighing yourself on a scale again eg: your actual weight is 235 so the scale results aren't valid) |
Quantitative
|
Studies are based on positivism and use deductive theory testing
|
Qualitative
|
Studies are based on interpretivism and use inductive theory testing
|
Errors in Explanation: Ecological Fallacy
|
The empirical observations are at too high of a level for the stated causal relationship eg: Cricket is popular in India therefore all Indians love cricket
|