Front | Back |
social groups
|
A collection of people who share a common Identity and regularly interact with one another on the basis of shared expectations concerning behavior
|
Social aggregates
|
A simple collection of people who happen to be together in a particular place but do not significantly identify or interact with one another i.e. stadium or concert croud
|
In groups
|
Any group or category in which people feel they belong, and feel loyalty toward any "we" or us" i.e. from teenage clique, to whole society
|
Symbolic interactionism
|
Theory developed by George Herbert Mead- emphasizes the role of symbols and language as key elements in human interaction
|
Primary groups
|
Members who care about you, and provide a sense of belonging and shared identity. provide anchor point in society. i.e. fam. friends, class mates, gang members, coworkers
|
How does Stanley Milgram's experiment relate to authority
|
Authority can influence people to act against their morality. few people have the resources needed to resist authority.
|
Dyads
|
Two person social group. one relationship
|
Organizations
|
Large sets of individuals with a definite set of authority relations. many types exist in industrialized societies. they influence most aspects of our lives. close link between development of organizations and bureaucratic tendencies.
|
Max Weber's theory on Organizations(rationality)
|
Attempt to achieve maximum efficiency. trained leasers planned policies. tasks became more specialized. standardized products allowed for more efficiency, speed, and precision.
|
Formal relations
|
between people as stated in the rules of the organization.
|
McDonaldization
|
sameness (store plans, products, procedures)Why? predictability ; calculated so that everything fits a standard. increased control over employees and customers so that there is less variables to consider.
|
Max Weber on "Ideal type of bureaucracy"
|
Used as a model for specific cases. refers to dominant, essential characteristics, not a good or perfect org. 5 characteristics. 1)clear hierarchy of authority 2) rules for conduct of officials at all levels 3) full time, salaried officials 4) separation of tasks, outside life. 5)no members own the material resources
|
Transformational leadership
|
Goes beyond routine, instilling in members of their group a sense of mission or higher purpose, thereby changing nature of the group. leave their "stamp" on group. as apposed to transactional leadership (just get the job done).
|
Problematic issues with rigid beauracratic organizations
|
Informal relations (ways of doing things) often allowed for a flexibility that couldn't otherwise be achieved. to much rigidity limits informal relations.
|
Evolution of modern organizations
|
Developed by Max Weber- development began with industrialization in 1700's, became dominant form by 1800's. rationalization as observation of large orgs.tasks became more specialized. some jobs taken over by machines.these modern rational orgs. are called formal orgs. Bureaucracy- specific type w/ purpose of maxing efficiency. (formal relations, clearly laid out rules, stated goals)
|