Front | Back |
Deviance and examples
|
-The positive and negative ways breaking or non-conforming of social norms as an indevidual or group. Breaking of social norms can be informal or against the law
Hair Clothing Jewlery Personality Actions Modivations (ie. smoking) Religion Make-up Relationships Attitudes Being in a sub culture |
Positivist Perspective of Deviance-Definition and Focus
|
Objectivist
Deviance: Violation of absolute norm (society has a widespread consensus) Abnormalities, harm, uniquness Focus: Why people are deviant and how they can be stopped ~We all see things the same way |
Interpretive Perspective of Deviance-Definition and Focus
|
Subjectivist
Deviance: What society so labels (it's a social construction & involves social rxn) Focus: Meanings attached to people and consequences of labelling ~No one characteristic defines deviance ~Impact of labelling |
4 Common Characteristics of Objectivist approach (SHNN)
|
Statistical Rarity
Harm Negative Societal Rxn Normative Violation |
Statistical Rarity
|
Something is deviant if it is rare
Limitations: -"rare" can have more than one meaning (once a day/year) -common things may be unacceptable ,', not rare -rare things may be acceptable ( hardly wearing sun screen in summer) |
Harm
|
Something is deviant of harms self or world physically or emotionally
Limitations; -perception of harm varies over time - perception of harm is subjective (interpreted to ones own bias--depends on person) |
Negative Social Rxn
|
Negative rxn by society's masses (ie Surveys, public opinion polls, elected officials as abuse)
Limitations -Whose rxns count the most -People might be deviantized even if "masses" react positively |
Normative Violation
|
Deviance is violating the social norms
Limitations: - Lack of consensus over norms - Does criminal law reflect consensus? |
Important points about Subjectivist approach
|
-No common "objective" traits amung deviants (no rules)
-Dominant moral codes are socially constructed -The definition of what is and is not deviant changes across cultures, over time, in different situations, and depending on who is defining deviance and who is being defined |
Cultural Relativism
|
Definition of deviance varies across cultures
|
Historical Relativism
|
Definition of deviance changes over time
|
Situational Relativism
|
Definition of deviance varies from situation to situation
|
Status-based Relativism
|
Definition of deviance depends on a) who is defining and b) who is being deviant
|
Objective-Subjective Continuum
|
Objective---------------------------Subjective
(absolutive view.................radical constructionism) Not always one or the other; sometimes in between |
Social Typing Process (& 3 components) DEP
|
Process where a person, behaviour, or characteristic is deviantized
Has 3 components: -Description-The label or category -Evaluation- The judgement or assumption -Prescription- The social control |