Front | Back |
A public relations personnel must be aware that they can be held legally liable if they provide advice or tacitly support an illegal activity of a client or an employer. This area of liability is called?
|
Conspiracy
|
A PR personel can be named as a coconspirator with other organization officials if he or she...
|
- participates in illegal action- guides the policy behind an illegal action-major personal part in illegal action- helps establish a front group- cooperates to further illegal action
|
These rules also apply to what in public relations?PR cannot hide behind the idea that...
|
Distribution of false/misleading infothey told me to do it
|
Libel is?Slander is?Defamation?
|
Printed falsehoodoral statments that are falsecollective term for the two
|
What is any false statement about a person or organization that creates public hatred, contempt, ridicule, or inflicts inujury on a person?
|
Defamation
|
What does a person filing a libel suit have to prove?
|
- the statement was published- person was identified- injury- person making the statement was malicious or negligent
|
Who has more success in winning defamation suits?
|
Private citizens versus public figures or corporations?
|
Why?
|
New York Times vs Sullivan- must prove actual malice
|
Corporations are considered publics because of what?
|
1- engage in advertising and promotion2- often involved in matters of public controversy/policy3- access to the media
|
Corporations are now using what to sue news organizations, rather than libel claims?
|
Fraud and contract law
|
Public Relations must be careful in their choice of words in News Releases.In situations involving personnel, organizations often try to avoid lawsuits by saying an employee left why?
|
For personal reasonsto persue other interests
|
What is another potentially dangerous practice involving competitor products?
|
Making unflattering comments about the competition products
|
There is a narrow line between what in comparison?
|
Comparison and "trade libel" or "product siparagement"
|
What is suggested to clearly indicate the differents of opinion and statements of facts?
|
1- opinion statements be accopanied by facts its based on2- opinions must be clearly labeled3- opinions should be reviewed for legal implications
|
What else opperates when organizations sue for defamation?other than libel
|
Fair comment and criticism
|