Public Relations: Chapter 12

Public Relations

136 cards   |   Total Attempts: 188
  

Cards In This Set

Front Back
A public relations personnel must be aware that they can be held legally liable if they provide advice or tacitly support an illegal activity of a client or an employer. This area of liability is called?
Conspiracy
A PR personel can be named as a coconspirator with other organization officials if he or she...
- participates in illegal action- guides the policy behind an illegal action-major personal part in illegal action- helps establish a front group- cooperates to further illegal action
These rules also apply to what in public relations?PR cannot hide behind the idea that...
Distribution of false/misleading infothey told me to do it
Libel is?Slander is?Defamation?
Printed falsehoodoral statments that are falsecollective term for the two
What is any false statement about a person or organization that creates public hatred, contempt, ridicule, or inflicts inujury on a person?
Defamation
What does a person filing a libel suit have to prove?
- the statement was published- person was identified- injury- person making the statement was malicious or negligent
Who has more success in winning defamation suits?
Private citizens versus public figures or corporations?
Why?
New York Times vs Sullivan- must prove actual malice
Corporations are considered publics because of what?
1- engage in advertising and promotion2- often involved in matters of public controversy/policy3- access to the media
Corporations are now using what to sue news organizations, rather than libel claims?
Fraud and contract law
Public Relations must be careful in their choice of words in News Releases.In situations involving personnel, organizations often try to avoid lawsuits by saying an employee left why?
For personal reasonsto persue other interests
What is another potentially dangerous practice involving competitor products?
Making unflattering comments about the competition products
There is a narrow line between what in comparison?
Comparison and "trade libel" or "product siparagement"
What is suggested to clearly indicate the differents of opinion and statements of facts?
1- opinion statements be accopanied by facts its based on2- opinions must be clearly labeled3- opinions should be reviewed for legal implications
What else opperates when organizations sue for defamation?other than libel
Fair comment and criticism