Front | Back |
According to Morrison, the success of science has led him to conclude that he should only accept things that can be established scientifically.
|
False
|
Philosophers are interested in determining whether modern science somehow undermines religious belief or whether belief without scientific proof is acceptable.
|
True
|
Morrison argues that the argument from agreement is correct.
|
False
|
The argument from agreement maintains that God must exist on the basis of the fact that many people throughout the world believe in the existence of God.
|
True
|
Morrison’s argument is an argument from design.
|
True
|
An argument from design is an ontological argument.
|
False
|
Morrison’s argument is a teleological argument.
|
True
|
A teleological argument does not begin with empirical observations.
|
False
|
An argument that begins with empirical bservations is an a posteriori argument.
|
True
|
An argument that does not use empirical information is a priori.
|
True
|
A teleological argument wants to show that there is a goal in nature that could have only been provided by God.
|
True
|
According to Morrison, mathematics cannot help to establish the existence of God.
|
False
|
According to Morrison, if the earth rotated significantly slower, ocean vapors would make ice continents.
|
False
|
According to Morrison, while life has “neither weight nor dimensions,” it is capable of force.
|
True
|
According to Morrison, nature creates all of life, in that it designs every leaf of every tree and colors every flower.
|
False
|