Philosophy 130 Test 2

Philosophy 130 Test 2

35 cards   |   Total Attempts: 188
  

Cards In This Set

Front Back
Kants View on Morality
-the good will (referring to faculty of volition) is the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification, or good in itself. A good will is a will that does as reason bids, not as inclination (desire or emotion) demands.
-rationalist view in that it relies on reason only, not experience
-
Imperative
one rule that we should always act on
Kant's Act in Accord with Duty
If and only if it is the right act, regardless of the motive
Kants Act Done from Duty
If and only if one does the right act with the right motive.
The self-interested tradesman:“ . . .it is always a matter of duty that a tradesman should not overcharge an inexperienced purchaser (57).
in accord with duty because it is right to charge a fair price, but it is done from inclination (desire) and not from duty (out of respect for the moral law).
An act with moral worth (Kant)
An act done from duty alone, with out inclination.
Hypothetical imperatives
command conditionally
They are if-then claims: If you want X, then do Y!
Categorical imperatives
are not conditional or hypothetical, but command categorically.
A categorical imperative is in the form, “Do Y!”
Peter Singer on Equality of Humans
The principle of the equality of human beings is not a description of an alleged actual equality among humans
it is a prescription of how we should treat human beings
Speciesism
A prejudice or bias in favor of the interests of one’s own species and against the interests of other species.
Why is speciesism wrong, according to Singer?
If a being can suffer, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration. YES.
Singers Value of Lives
Singer believes that human lives are, in general, more valuable than the lives of nonhuman animals
Why does Steinbock believe it is justified to treat human interests as weightier than those of nonhuman animals?
1) Taking care of our own: Singer thinks this is a bad reason
2) Higher capacities: Responsibility Capacity for rational altruism Desire for self-respect
Steinbocks Claim
it is our higher capacities that serve to justify the claim that human interests should be treated as primary
Important Problem with Steinbock's Claim
If our higher capacities justify unequal treatment, why should a human without these capacities receive more consideration than, say, an extraordinary chimp?