Front | Back |
Kantianism:
Deontological moral theories
|
We have a duty to do or refrain from doing certain actions no matter what the consequences (focus on motive not result)
|
Kantianism:
Kant’s Theory of a Good Will
|
The only thing good w/out qualification is a good will
|
Kantianism:
Morally Worth
|
Actions have moral worth when they are both morally right and morally praiseworthy.
|
Kantianism:
Moral Rightness
|
Right= done in accordance with duty
|
Kantianism:
Moral Praiseworthiness
|
Praiseworthy= done from duty
|
Kantianism:
Hypothetical / Categorical Imperative distinction
|
Hypothetical imperative= if you desire/want X to come about, then you ought do Y
Catergorical= DO Y
|
Kantianism:
Categorical Imperative – Universal Law Formulation
|
All duties derived from this:
an act is morally right iff the agent can rationally will that the generalized form of the maxim become a universal law
|
Arguments against the Universal Law Formulation of the CI:
Exceptions to Rules Objection
|
CI-rules apply to all agents at all times, but sometimes exceptions must happen, so CI is false
|
Arguments against the Universal Law Formulation of the CI:
Maxim-Specificity Objection
|
Right/wrong depends on maxim, but a change of maxim changes moral status meaning CI isn't an adequate method to tell right/wrongness
|
Arguments against the Universal Law Formulation of the CI:
Moral Dilemmas Objection
|
Kantianism says moral rules are absolute, but sometimes you MUST chose, and A and B are both wrong
|
Arguments against the Universal Law:
Irrationality
|
To will a contradiction, to will P and Q when u cant have P and Q, to will P where everyone who is rational wills not P
|
Categorical Imperative – Means-End Formulation
|
Treat people as an end, never only as a means
|
Mere things/persons distinction
|
Instrumental value or persons/rational agents
|
Punishment:
Retributivism
|
Punishment justified when person is quilty & punishment fits crime (wrongness of the crime and criminal’s degree of responsibility)
|
Punishment:
Retributivism's View on Criminals
|
Free rational agents who earn their punishment, Used free will to chose own penalty, Respects agent’s choices- not using them as a means
|