Front | Back |
Robert and Scneiders view of sport? does view provide an answer to the dilemma posed by the case of clubless but not clueless josie?
|
View of sport is every player takes the interest in sport and makes it his or her own. believe everyone plays for his or her interest. Interests would give clubs to Josi
|
Philosophical foundation of John Russell's account of the morality of sport?
|
Russell believes that morality values are not based soley in sports but exist in a larger more general theory. the continuity thesis is the foundation. values in real life continue in sport. hockey player hitting one is morally wrong
|
John Russell's view of sport according to robert simon? does such a view provide a solution to the case of josie clubless but not clueless
|
According to simon, russell uses the best interpretation view and sport. criticizes because it allows for clear definition. things depend on culture and people.
|
Robert simon view of sport according to John Russell??
|
According to Russell, Simon is a little confused, he believes that simons broad internalism view actually supports the continuity thesis rather than the separation thesis. according to separation thesis, Josie should not be given clubs.
|
Fundamental difference between robert simons and john russels view of sport?
|
Robert simon argues for broad internalism and argues against formalism, not because of cheaters paradox, but because of luck of normative resources. No explanation for moral problem that arise in sport. he also argues against conventionalism
John Russell: argues against separation thesis, he believes that simons broad internalism supports continuity thesis. he beleives that simons broad internalism supports coninuity thesis. |