Front | Back |
Negative publicity about a celeb’s personal life plays a big role which
|
Increases the risk.
|
•“an enduring organization of motivational, emotional, perceptual, and cognitive processes with respect to some aspect of our environment.” Hawkins & Mothersbaugh •“the way we think, feel, and act toward some aspect of our environment.” Hawkins, Best and Coney (2004) •“a learned predisposition to respond in a consistently favorable or unfavorable manner with respect to a given object.” Fishbein & Ajzen (1975) |
An attitude is
|
1. Lack of Need 2. Lack of Ability
3. Failure to Consider Relative Attitudes 4. Attitude Ambivalence 5. Weakly Held Beliefs and Affect 6. Failure to Consider Interpersonal Influence 7. Failure to Consider Situational Factors 8. Measurement Issues |
Eight factors may account for inconsistencies:
|
Change the Cognitive Component Change the Affective Component
Change the Behavioral Component |
Attitude Change Strategies
|
• Compared to attitudes formed under the peripheral route, attitudes formed under the central route tend to be 111-14 stronger more resistant to counter-persuasion attempts more accessible from memory, and more predictive of behaviors |
Core Tenants of ELM: Part I
|
• Peripheral Cues (PCs) influence persuasion under LOW INVOLVEMENT but not HIGH INVOLVEMENT 11-15 • Central Cues (CCs) influence persuasion under HIGH INVOLVEMENT but not LOW INVOLVEMENT BUT there are caveats and exceptions relating to cue relevance and competitive situation. Cue Relevance - What is a PC/CC? |
Core Tenants of ELM: Part II
|
Example: An attractive model (and her hair) may be
111-16 decision irrelevant (PC) in an ad for a car, but decision relevant (CC) in an ad for shampoo. • In this case, the attractive model would influence persuasion under high involvement for shampoos but not for cars. |
Cue Relevance - What is a PC/CC? •
|
PCs can influence persuasion under HI INVOLVEMENT in competitive situations when:
• Central cues neutralize due to homogeneity across competing brands (PC then becomes tie breaker). • Attribute tradeoffs across central cues engenders decision difficulty which PCs help to alleviate. |
Competitive Situation -
|
• Consumers are not passive to persuasion attempts • Consumers are often skeptical (an individual
11-18 characteristic) and resist persuasion • Consumers frequently infer an advertiser’s intent and respond in light of that presumed selling intent. |
Consumer Resistance to Persuasion
|
Discrediting Discounting
Containment |
Resisting Brand Attacks
|
1. Source Characteristics Represents “who” delivers the message 2. Appeal Characteristics Represents “how” the message is communicated 3. Message Structure Characteristics Represents “how” the message is presented |
Three types of communication characteristics:
|
1. SourceCredibility
• Persuasion is easier when the target market views the message source as highly credible 2. CelebritySources • Celebrity sources can be effective in enhancing attention, attitude toward the ad, trustworthiness, expertise, aspirational aspects, and meaning transfer 3. Sponsorship • Sponsorships often work in much the same manner as using a celebrity endorser |
Source Characteristics
|
Effectiveness enhanced when marketers match: •image of the celebrity with •personality of the product with •actual or desired self-concept of the target market. |
Celebrity sources widely used.
|
Cellphone text monitoring ad
|
This ad is a great example of the use of fear appeal.
In this case, it is used to spell out the risks of parents failing to monitor the text messaging by their children. |
? attempt to build a personality for the product or create an image of the product user. * Most effective for products designed to enhance self- image or provide other intangible benefits |
Value-expressive appeals
|