Front | Back |
To determine whether a duty of care has been breached, a judge asks how he or she would have acted in the same circumstances. T or F?
|
False- how a REASONABLE person would have acted (reasonable person standard)
|
Negligent misrepresentation doesnt require an intent to defraud
|
True
|
A defamatory statement must be communicated to a thrid party to be actionable
|
True
|
Puffery is fraud
|
False- puffery is seller's opinion. Fraud is based on misrepresentation of fact
|
Depriving an owner of personal property without permission and without just cause, to place it in anothers service, is conversion
|
True
|
Conversion is wrongfully taking or retaining an individuals personal property and placing it in the service of another
|
True
|
Disparagement of property is another term for appropriation
|
False-disparagement of property is slander of quality or slander of title
appropriation is using someones name, characteristic etc without permission for personal benefit
|
Bona fide competitive behavior can constitute wrongful interference with a contractual relationship
|
False-Bona fide is okay even if it is breaking a contract or other business relation
|
An internet service provider is not normally liable for its user's defamatory remarks
|
True
|
A wrongful act need not actually be the cause of an injury for liability on a theory of negligence,
*elements of negligence
|
False- one of negligence required to establish negligence is injury/damage. Think "but for" the wrongful act, the injury would have never occured.
*4 elements- duty, breech,causation, damages
|