Front | Back |
Appeal to Ignorance
|
Because something is not known to be true, it is assumed to be false (or conversely).
|
Begging the Question
|
The truth of the conclusion is already assumed in the premises.
|
Complex Question
|
Two unrelated points are conjoined as a single proposition.
|
False Dilemma
|
Two choices are given when in fact there are three (or more) options.
|
Hegelian Fallacy
|
It is assumed that the middle position between two extremes must be correct simply because it is the middle position.
|
Pseudo-Tolerance
|
The assumption that "I must respect all opinions" (or some variation) ends the need for further consideration of an issue.
|
Relativist Fallacy
|
A person rejects a claim by asserting that the claim might be true for others but is not for him/her.
|
Who is to say?
|
The rhetorical “Who is to say?” question is supposed to “prove” that there is no way to decide whether any position or view is better than another.
|
Affirming the Consequent
|
Any argument of the form: If p then q, q, therefore p.
|
Denying the Antecedent
|
Any argument of the form: If p then q, not p, therefore, not q.
|
Inconsistency
|
Asserting that contrary or contradictory statements are both true.
|
Missing the Point
|
An argument in defense of one conclusion instead proves a different conclusion.
|
Attacking the Person
|
- the person's character is attacked
- the person's circumstances are noted (circumstantial)
- the person does not practice what is preached
|
Appeal to Authority
|
The fact that some sort of authority states something does not, in general, serve as evidence that the claim is true.
|
Style Over Substance
|
The manner in which an argument (or arguer) is presented is felt to affect the truth of the conclusion.
|