Logic Exam 1

These are the definititions.

47 cards   |   Total Attempts: 189
  

Cards In This Set

Front Back
Argument
A group of statements, one or more of which (the premises) are claimed to provide support for, or reasons to believe, one of the others (the conclusion)
Types of non-arguments
(10) Warnings, Pieces of Advice, Statemetns of Belief, Statements of Opinion, Loosely Associated Statements, Reports, Expository Passages, Illustrations, Explanations, Conditional Statements
Deductive argument
An argument incorporating the claim that it is impossible for the conclusion to be false givent that the premises are true.
Inductive argument
An argument incorporating the claim that it is improbable that the conclusion is false given that the premises are true.
Types of deductive arguments
(5) Argument Based on Mathematics, Argument from Definition, Categorical Syllogism, Hypothetical Syllogism, Disjunctive Syllogism
Types of inductive arguments
(6) Prediction, Argument from Analogy, Generalization, Argument from Authority, Argument Based on Signs, Causal Inference
Validity
An argument in which it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true.
Invalidty
A deductive argument which it IS possible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true, the conclusion doesn't follow.
Inferential Claim
A claim that alleged evidence or reasons support or imply something.
Factual Claim
A claim that something is true; a claim that evidence or reasons are being presented.
Strength
An inductive argument in which it is improbable that the conclusion will be false given that the premises are true
Weak
An argument in which the conclusion does not follow probably from the premises, even though it is claimed to.
Soundness/Unsoundness
Sound is a deductive argument that is is valid and has all true premises, if either condition is missing the argument is unsound.
Appeal to Force
Argumentum ad Baculum. Arguer threatens reader/listener.
Cogency/Uncogency
Cogent is an inductive argument that is STRONG and has all true premises, if either condition is missing the argument is uncogent.