Front | Back |
R v Greenfield
|
Conspiracy depends on the agreement itself and does not neccessitate further participation in the commission of the crime.
|
When is a conspiracy completed? (ends)
|
Johnston: when have done intended/frustrated/abandoned. Thus have jurisdiction even if agreement made overseas. Janis disagrees, ends with agreement.
|
R v Gemmell
|
"A conspiracy consists of an agreement of 2 or more to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means, act against act, promise against promise"
MR:person must know factually what they have agreed to do, but it is not necessary they know it to be a crime (mistake of law will not be a defence)
Agreement which stops shor tof intent to carry through to completition--> dont have intention to put common design into effect is insufficient
|
Lang
|
Left it open whether can have purley internal conspiracies which have no effect on 3rd parties, e.g. conspiring to supply a drug to herself?
|
Savage
|
Conspiring with persons unknown- dont have to prove number or identity of co accused.
|
Walker, Parnell
|
Hadnt gone beyond negotiation so no agreementm conviction quashed. Sometimes agreement can be inferred due to pursuance of common object, even if havent met.
|
Churchill v Walton
|
Honest belief in a state of facts will be a defence: " If on the facts known to them, what they agreed to was lawful, they are not rendered artificially guilty by the presence of other facts"
|
R v Richards
|
Must have agreed to do something which in the circ, had they not, would have been of practical consequence
|
Anderson
|
Jail break. UK rejected defence that didnt intend to carry part out as didnt think would succeed, anyone can claim this. However, conspiracy with no intention?
|
Yip Chiv Cheung
|
Drugs conspiracy, 1 DEA agent. Still having intention but with an ulterior motive (in this case drug enforcement) did not negate MR for conspiracy
|
Broad
|
Variation in agreement, cocaine and heroin immaterial (class A drugs)
|
Taaffe
|
Cant commit conspire to commit imaginery crimes
|
DPP v Nock
|
Impossible to produce cocaine from substance so agreement could never result in commission, no conspiracy
|
Sew Hoy
|
Distinguished Nock: If agreement couldnt result in crime due to legal/physical imposs, no conspiracy. If imposs due to insufficiency of means, someone unwilling/unable, still guilty of conspiracy.
|