Front | Back |
Bill of Rights (Bill of liberties)
|
-
the first 10 amendments of our constitution
|
The Bill of Rights was not a part of the constitution when?
|
at the ratification
|
Father considered how many rights?
|
-
They considered 12 but adopted 10
|
Barron vs. Baltimore
|
-
the bill of rights only protects you from the
federal government
|
14th amendment
|
- passed in 1868- = protection of newly freed slaves; speaks to
the states, “no state…” for the first time they are telling the states that
there are certain protections that exist among everyone regardless of what
state they inhabit
|
-
not until the 20th century came three
constitutional revolutions:
|
- Gitlow vs. NY 1925- Shank vs US 1919- Plessy vs. Fergurson 1895
|
Gitlow v. NY 1925
|
- Establishing Bill of Rights - Gitlow was a radical that was opposed to the way NY was being run and advocated the overthrow of the gov of NY- First time the court says that you can seek protection from the Bill of Rights. |
Shank v. US Freedom of Speech 1919
|
- Expanding the scope of our liberties
- Shank gave speeches encouraged young men to
refuse to be drafted into the war
|
1895 Plessy v. Fergurson
|
-
The revolution of civil rights-
civil liberties are liberies from the gov but civil right are a call for
the gov to act for you to bring back citizenship and protect liberties to which
we are entitled to
- Plessy was a black man who got tired of riding the back of the bus and ferguson was a bus driver; separate but equal, state was authorized to mandate the separation of races; Jim Crow Laws enforced separate but equal doctrine |
1954 Brown vs. Board
|
-
separation by its nation is unequal and end
segregation in schools
|
How the supreme court works
|
-
Standard to evaluate cases by the supreme court/ then presumption and/ than the other party must bear the burden of
proof
|
Reasonable standard
|
Gov could limit speech in any way that was reasonable/ therefore they had a presumption that the gov had been reasonable /and the individual had the burden to prove that the gov had been unreasonable
|
Clear and present standard
|
neutrality where the gov must show that there was a clear and present danger while being neutral
|
The preferred positions standard/ presumption
|
That the individual can say anything they want to/gov must show compelling reason
|