| Front | Back | 
| 
								Law of Detachment (Modus Ponens)									 | 
								In a premise and a conclusion if the premise is true then the conclusion is true Example: P-->QP-----Q | 
| 
								Law of contrapositive									 | 
								In a premise and a conclusion the negation of the conclusion is the premise to the negation of the premise as a conclusion Example:P-->Q------P--->-Q | 
| 
								Law of Modus Tollens									 | 
								In a premise and a conclusion if the conclusion is given to be not true then the premise is not true Example:P-->Q-Q------P | 
| 
								Chain Rule (law of syllogism)									 | 
								In a premise and conclusion if the conclusion is the premise to X then the first premise's conclusion is also X. Example:P--->QQ--> R--------P---->R | 
| 
								Law of disjunctive inference									 | 
								In and 'OR" V'" question if one of the ideas is proven false the other is true Example1: Example 2:PVQ PVQ-P -Q------ ---------------------------Q P | 
| 
								Law of double negation									 | 
								In a statement if a negation is negated then it is canceled outExample:-(-P)-----P									 | 
| 
								De Morgan's Laws									 | 
								If an 'AND ^' statement is negated both ideas are negated and the 'AND ^' Switches to "OR V"If an 'OR V" statement is negated both ideas are negated and the "OR V" statement switches to "AND ^"Example1:-(P^Q)---------PV-QExample 2:-(PVQ)--------P^-Q									 | 
| 
								Law of simplification									 | 
								In an 'AND ^' Statement both ideas are automatically proven correctly by being part of itExample:P^Q-----PQ									 | 
| 
								Law of conjunction									 | 
								If two statements are both true they can be grouped into an "AND ^" formatExample:PQ-----P^Q									 | 
| 
								Law of disjunctive addition									 | 
								If any statement is true it can be grouped into a "OR V" format because all it takes for an "OR V" format is for one of the ideas to be trueExample:-QP-----PVQ									 |