Front | Back |
Across species,
sexual selection usually acts more strongly on males than on females. Explain
why this occurs.
|
Females are the
limiting sex because they produce eggs, which are much more costly to produce
than sperm.
Female obligatory investment is far greater than male obligatory investment because of the difference in sperm (smaller, requires less energy, higher in numbers) and eggs (larger, single egg, requires more energy). Females can have only a limited number of offspring, while males can virtually have an unlimited number. Thus females need to be much choosier, and therefore create sexual selection in males. In order to gain access to females they must compete for access to resources that will increase their mate value. Therefore sexual selection has acted heavily on certain male traits so that they may compete with other males for females (***intrasexual selection) AND be able to attract females (***intersexual selection). |
Describe three
human male morphological (not behavioral) attributes that are plausibly
explained as being the product of sexual selection.
|
V-shaped body
(more upper body muscle, than lower body muscle)
Masculine face Penal ridge |
For each item
listed in (b) (
Describe three
human male morphological (not behavioral) attributes that are plausibly
explained as being the product of sexual selection), explain the adaptive significance (i.e., the ultimate function)
of the given feature.
|
A V-shaped body
would give a man more upper body strength for combat, in order to compete for
women and resources.
A masculine face is an indicator of good genes. Facial masculinity is affected by androgen production during development, which may be a costly signal of food condition. The penal ridge displaces residual semen of previous male to allow for more successful insemination by current male and exclusion of any other sperm from fertilizing the ovum of the female. |
Women seem to
generally consider men who are taller than average to be more attractive than
men of average height. By itself, this preference should lead us to expect that
men would have become progressively taller over evolutionary time. However, it
is likely that contemporary men are not substantially taller than were men in
ancestral hunter-gatherer societies. Explain why men have not become
progressively taller over evolutionary time.
|
It is possible
to be too tall. Natural selection tends to favor the population mean,
weeding out the tails of the distribution. Ecological constraints
probably caused natural selection to penalize very tall men (eg. Broken bones,
higher metabolic costs, poorer balance and agility, awkward gait, and body
carriage), causing optimal male height to converge on some constrained limit.
(from reading about what women look for in men) --Natural selection and sexual selection can work against each other.
|
Compared to other mammalian females, women
are unusual in that they seem to exhibit a number of sexually selected
morphological traits. List two prominent morphological traits that distinguish
human females and explain how these may have been produced by sexual selection.
|
1.
Protruding Breasts: Honest signal of residual
reproductive value, age. Breast form changes after breast feeding.
2. Facial Neotony: Facial attractiveness such as large eyes, small ears and full lips provide honest cues to health and mate value. There is intrasexual pressure on females to look younger on their faces to enhance prospective reproduction- changing female morphology. |
2. Men are more likely to be involved in
lethal violence than women.
a) Provide an ultimate explanation for this sex difference. |
Males are more
likely to be involved in violence because they are competing for resources
and/or mating opportunity (which will increase their reproductive success). For
males, access to mates is the limiting factor for reproductive success. Thus,
they will be more willing to take higher risks to obtain mates, even if they
will be killed in the process because the payoff in the end (passing one’s
genes to the next generation) outweighs the cost of even death. Even after
death, males can profit from females taking the burden of internal gestation,
placentation and lactation. It wouldn’t make sense for the female to be more
violent in their mating effort because it risks the end of an already limited
reproductive career--women can only bear so many offspring compared to the many
progeny that a male can potentially produce with his relatively cheaper sperm.
|
Some scholars claim that, rather than being
due to evolved psychological differences between men and women, the sex
difference in involvement in homicide derives from the differences in physical
size and strength between men and women. Describe one piece of evidence that is
inconsistent with this claim, and explain its relevance.
|
If homicide was
influenced by different size and strength of males and females then it would
only make a difference if those who were less in size and strength (women) were
victims of those who were greater in size and strength (men). But, as
research indicates, this is not the case. Men rarely commit homicide
against women. In comparison to the amount that men commit homicide
against other men, women victims are proportionally smaller.
|
The epidemiology of homicide closely matches
that of other dangerous behaviors, such that individuals who are likely to be
involved in the former are also likely to be involved in the latter. From an
ultimate perspective, why do these parallels occur?
|
Risk-taking
behavior-- Taking more risks gives you higher status, a reputation follows you.
Ultimately selection may favor increasingly dangerous behavior, because it
distinguishes fitness levels among males. The “winners” are potentially those
who have a higher mate value/quality and will ultimately gain access to females
and therefore increase their reproductive success. This is a time in their
lives of: uncertainty in their future success, sexual maturity, peak physiology
for power activities (more fast twitch muscles, upper body larger than lower
body). These dangerous behaviors are a way for men to compete indirectly or
directly with each other to gain
reputations, achieve status, acquire resources etc.
|
i) From an ultimate evolutionary perspective, i)
why should females attend to male risk-taking behavior?
|
females should
be attentive to risk taking behavior because it is an honest signal that the
male has survival skills. § Risk taking selected for as a mating strategy
(honest signal that peacocks can survive predators). Will be impressive but
will increase probability of mortality. The males who survive risk taking behavior will potentially be of
higher fitness than males who do not survive risk taking behavior.
|
ii) From an ultimate evolutionary
perspective, why should males attend to other males' risk-taking behavior?
|
ii) -Direct
contest (win it now).
Reputation effect |
) It appears that men aspire to take more
risks than would optimally impress an audience of women. Explain how this
pattern sheds light on the nature of the selection pressures that have shaped
male risk-taking behavior.
|
This directly
relates to the fact that selection pressures have been stronger in males than
in females. Females are more selective in their choice of a mate which is why
males must compete in risky behaviors in the first place: to get females’
attention and advertise themselves as quality mates. Therefore if a male can
show off his mate value, through honest signals of risk taking in front of
multiple women, his access to the number of females may be potentially
increased. It’s worth it to overcompensate.
|
In some societies, economic resources are
relatively evenly distributed across the population, while in other societies
there are large differences in wealth between the rich and the poor. Comparing
various societies, scientists have found that the degree of economic inequality
characteristic of a society is positively correlated with the per capita
homicide rate. Provide an ultimate explanation for this pattern.
|
When the
availability of resources is unevenly distributed between males, we can expect
males with more resources to have access to more females, therefore higher
levels of reproductive fitness. Males with lower resource availability
therefore must find a way in which they can compete with more successful males.
This usually results some risk-taking behavior. Thus males with lower resources
have less to lose in risk-engaging behaviors. Therefore, in societies were we
see a greater inequality in the distribution of resources, will have higher
statistics of risk taking behaviors like
homicide.
|
There is evidence that a number of factors
potentially influence a heterosexual woman’s interest in extra-pair
copulations.
a) Describe two attributes, other than age, of a woman’s primary partner that are expected to increase the likelihood that she will experience increased interest in extra-pair copulations. Provide an ultimate explanation for this pattern. |
1)low sexiness ranking: if a female
is not highly attracted to her partner, during times of high fertility, she may
exhibit higher attraction to males who are attractive.
2) lower social status: though he may be willing to provide for her, if he is lower on the social scale, he may not have the means to protect her, no “insurance” – this can be increased with an EPC with a higher status male |
b) Describe one attribute, other than age,
along which men vary that is expected to influence the likelihood that they
will be selected by women as extra-pair partners. Provide an ultimate
explanation for this pattern.
|
1) More masculine features: facial
masculinity is affected by androgen production during development, which may
serve as a costly signal of good condition. Studies have shown that women have
a stronger preference for men with more masculine facial features as potential
short-term mates, especially around the fertile phases of their cycle
(ovulation). Male attractiveness may serve as an honest signal of good
genes.
|
A common pattern around the globe is for a
woman’s long-term partner to be older than she is. i) Provide an ultimate
explanation for why such a pattern is often advantageous to the woman.
. ii) Provide an ultimate explanation for why
women whose husbands are substantially older than themselves (i.e., multiple
decades) can be expected to pursue extra-pair copulations to a greater extent
than women whose husbands are closer to their own age.
|
i) Older = more
access to resources, more time to have built up a reputation/status.
ii) Females may be less sexually attracted to the older men. Since they are constantly looking for good genes for their offspring, they may be more susceptible to EPCs with younger men that exhibit better, healthier, younger genes. |