Front | Back |
Parti Ecologiste v European Parliament
|
Measures adopted by the European Parliament intended to have legal effects Vis-a-Vis third parties
|
Commission v Council
|
A resolution adopted by the council of Ministers to participate in the European Road Transport Agreement
|
International Fruit Co v Commission
|
If a regulation could be regarded as a decision, then it can be challenged.
|
Codorniu v EC Council
|
Relaxed the rules of whether regulations with general application could be challenged by individuals
|
Plaumann v Commission
|
The test for individual concern
|
Alfred Toepfer and Getreide-Import Gesellschaft v Commission |
Concept of fixed, closed class for an importer
|
Les Verts v Parliament |
Closed fixed class of political parties affected by a decision
|
AITEC v Commission
|
If applicant is a trade association representing the itnerests of those who are individually concerned.
|
France v Commission
|
Commission signed an international agreement that should have been signed by the council
|
Maizena v Council
|
Council failed to consult the European parliament, where they were obliged to under treaty
|
Lord Bethel v Commission
|
Locus standi for an individual challenging an act - didnt involve him
|
European parliament v Commission
|
The obligation placed on the commission by the treaty was not worded precisely enough for a failure to perform this obligation to be a failure to act.
|