Front | Back |
LOGIC
|
the system of rules governing language for
the purpose of argumentation
|
LANGUAGE
|
The medium of epistemological
expression for the human being
|
ARGUMENT
|
A set of propositions, one of
which (the conclusion/thesis) follows necessarily from the
other(s)(premise(s)); a syllogism is two premises with a conclusion—it has only
three terms: the major term is the predicate of the conclusion, the minor term
is the subject of the conclusion, and the middle term is the term that links
the subject and predicate of the conclusion and appears in both premises, but
never in the conclusion
|
PROPOSITION
|
A
statement (preferably with a simple subject, simple (active) verb, and a simple
predicate), that is either true or false and objectively verifiable (i.e.,
verifiable by some objective criterion).
|
THESIS
|
The
statement that follows from the other propositions; the conclusion or the main
point, in which the subject and predicate are linked
|
EPISTEMOLOGY
|
A branch of philosophy, along
with metaphysics and ethics, that studies human knowledge and human learning
|
KNOWLEDGE
|
The ability to demonstrate
one’s experience on one of two levels
|
FIRST ORDER KNOWLEDGE
|
(unconscious) impressions
|
SECOND ORDER KNOWLEDGE
|
Ideas formed (consciously, but more often
unconsciously) from impressions and reflected in behavior
|
LEARNING
|
A discursive process whereby one’s knowledge
is increased through dialogue; the creation of new categories of the mind
(formulation of ideas)
|
METAPHYSICS
|
That which is after/beyond
the physical realm—the realm of ideas; a
branch of philosophy in which one reasons/thinks about the first principles of
being (ultimate ideas)
|
THINKING/REASONING
|
Reflecting on one’s ideas or
evaluating one’s knowledge
|
CRITICAL THINKING
|
Consciously controlling the process of
ratiocination
|
RATIOCINATION
|
The process of abstracting
universals from particular experience
|
LOGIC
|
The system of rules governing language for the
purpose of argumentation
|