Front
|
Back
|
What is critical thinking? Why does it matter?
|
Critical thinking is being open-minded, yet skeptical, and using evidence to prove or disprove an argument that has, at best, one conclusion. It matters because it requires learning how to think rather than simply what to think.
|
What is deductive reasoning? Why does it matter?
|
- Deductive reasoning is an
argument that claims its conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
- If all the premises are true,
and if the argument is in the correct form, then the conclusion is
necessarily true and cannot be false.
- Deductive
reasoning matters because it implies certain truth.
|
What is
inductive reasoning? Why does it matter?
|
- Inductive reasoning is an
argument where the conclusion is more likely to be true than false based
on the evidence.
- It is a probability
statement.
- Inductive reasoning is
important because we use it just about every day when we extend what we
already know to situations that are not as familiar to us.
|
- How are
deductive and inductive reasoning different?
|
- Deductive reasoning implies
certain truth, and inductive reasoning is a probability statement.
|
- What are the
definitions for proposition, premise and conclusion? How are they
different to one another and how are they alike? How are they related? How
do they work to distinguish between a bad argument/case of critical
thinking and a good one?
|
- A proposition is a sentence
that admits truth value.
- A premise is a proposition in
an argument that supports the conclusion.
- A conclusion is the
proposition in an argument that is supported on the basis of other
propositions.
- They are different to one
another because they all represent different parts of an argument, but
they are alike because they are all found in a good argument.
- They are related because they
are all found in a good argument.
- They work to distinguish
between a good argument and a bad argument because if there is no truth to
them then the argument isn't valid.
|
- What is the
difference between bias and stereotype and why is it valuable to get them
out on the table?
|
- Bias is a pre-position, and
it usually has a negative connotation.
- Stereotype is a label given
to individual people based on their inclusion in a group.
- It is valuable to get them
out on the table because people that are biased or believe in stereotypes
won't be the best resources for evidence.
|
What are the components to a deductive valid and sound
argument?
|
- If a deductive argument is
valid it has the correct form.
- If a deductive argument is
sound then it is valid and all of the premises are true.
|
- What are MP,
MT, DS, Chain Argument, and what I called the 'Classic Argument' (1: All
men are mortal, 2: Socrates is a man, C: Socrates is a mortal)? Can you
pick these structures out of ordinary text (like the article UFO pages
126-129)?
|
- Modus ponens: affirms the
antecedent
- Modus tollens: negates the
consequent
- Disjunctive Syllogism: second premise is a negation premise
- Chain Argument: A=B, B=C, A=C
- If B, then C
- If A, then C
- Classic Argument: what is
true of all has to be true of one
- All humans are mortal <- universal
proposition
- Socrates is a human <-
particular proposition
- Socrates is a mortal
- Ex:
- All Packers
are football
players
- Aaron Rodgers is a Packer
- Aaron Rodgers is a football
player
|
- What is the
definition of inductive strength? How is it different from deductive
soundness?
|
- Deductive soundness means the
argument is valid and the premises are true.
- Inductive strength is how
good is the evidence and how much evidence is there.
|
|
A
confirmation bias is when someone has a set idea, and anyone who thinks
otherwise is wrong. If a person has a confirmation bias they tend to only
associate with other people who have the same opinions as them.
|
|
- Education in field of
expertise
- Experience making judgments
in the field
- Have a good reputation in
their field (peer-reviewed)
- Have some accomplishments in
the field
|
- 4 Types of
Inductive Reasoning
|
- Sample: subset of the
population
- Random
- Represents the population
- Relevant
- size
- Generalization
- Come up with a conclusion
about a population based on evidence from a sample of the population
- Ex: 8 in 10 people like
Crest
- Polls and Surveys
- Collect information from a
sample in order to make a generalization about a population
- Many polls are not good
samples
- Ex: self-selection: CNN,
Dancing with the Stars
- Good survey/poll
- True premises
- Right size(sample)
- Represents the population
- Random sample
- Data is current
- How much [sufficient
evidence]
- Analogies
- Comparative argument
- Something we know about to
something we don
- Ex: flow of water in a water
pipe :: flow of electricity in a wire
- Cause and Effect
- Correlation does not equal
causation
- Ex: Cheerleaders wear blue
ribbons does not equal the basketball team winning
- Causation (Hume)
- Causes have to precede
effects in time
- Causes and effects have to
be continuous in time and space
- History of 1 and 2
|
Rationalism and Empiricism
|
- Rationalism (Plato)
- Reason rules
- Truth and knowledge is
constant, knowable through the act of reason; is different from mere
appearances
- Empiricism (Hume)
- 5 senses
- Applying 5 senses by means
of scientific method
- Knowledge is testable,
falsifiable, confirmable, tentative
|
Five Criteria for Evaluating Definitions
|
- Not too broad; not too narrow
- Accounts for all the
essential characteristics (AFACE)
- Not circular
- Avoid obscure speech
|