Front | Back |
What is Negligence?
|
-Tortfeasor does NOTintend the consequences of the act or believe they will occur
-Actor’s conduct merely creates a foreseeable risk of injury -So unlike intentional torts, no intent needed |
What are the elements of negligence?
|
-Defendant owed Plaintiff a duty of care;
-Defendant breached that duty; -Plaintiff suffered legal injury; -Defendant’s breach caused the injury. (You need all elements for liability) |
If a person breaches a duty of care and another person suffers an injury, causation does not need to be established.(true/false)
|
False
|
If no harm results from an allegedly negligent act, there is no liability. (true/false)
|
True
|
To determine whether a duty of care has been breached, a judge asks how he or she would have acted in the same circumstances. (true/false)
|
False
|
How do the courts determine whether duty exists?
|
Reasonable person standard
|
How can a Defendant determine whether he owes the plaintiff a duty?
|
- Defendant owes a duty to protect Plaintiff from foreseeable risks that Defendant knew or should have known about
|
What is the duty of care policy?
|
- If we are to live in a society with others, some actions can be tolerated, some cannot
-People are free to act so long as their actions do not infringe on the interests of others |
The consequences of an act are legally foreseeable if they are....
|
Consequences that typically occur in the ordinary course of events
|
Whether an act is foreseeable is generally considered a question of fact to be determined by....
|
The jury
|
Duty of care varies based on...
|
The Defendents occupation or relationship to Plaintiff
|
Eve, an architect, hires Frank, an accountant, to handle her accounts. Dissatisfied with Frank's work, Eve sues him, alleging negligence. Frank may successfully defend against the suit by proving that he
____ a. did not injure Eve in any way. ____ b. does not know every principle of accounting. ____ c. performed as well as an ordinary person could have. ____ d. performed as well as Eve could have |
A.
|
Pat files a successful suit against Quality Stores based on Quality's negligence. Normally, an award in such a suit consists of
____ a. comparative damages. ____ b. compensatory damages. ____ c. contributory damages. ____ d. punitive damages. |
B
|
Liability for negligence requires a finding of causation in fact and a determination of proximate cause.
___ True ___ False |
True
|
For recovery to be sought there must be 2 things...
|
1. causation in fact
2. the act must be the proximate cause of the injury |