Front | Back |
what school believed Criminal as evil, sinner, pawn of the devil
|
Demonological
|
Dominated early explana5ons of
criminality
|
Demonological theory
|
• Attributed crime to supernatural forces
– Criminal viewed as a sinner who was possessed
by demons or damned by other-worldly forces
|
Demonological theory
|
A demonological method to determine guilt or innoence was ...
|
Trial by ordeal
|
Criminal as rational, free actor
|
Classical
|
2 principles of classical theory
|
– People have free will and ra5onal thought
– People are hedonic in their decision-making
• Guided by desire for pleasure and avoidance of pain
|
Overall, what does classical theorists believe crimes are committed for?
|
To recieve gains
|
According to classical theory, the purpose of punishment is ...
|
Deterence
|
Classical theorists believe punishment should be x2
|
- proportional to the interests violeaed by the crime
- should be consistently applied according to the crime |
Used science to explain crime, physical characteristics
|
Positivist theory
|
Shifted the focus from crime to the offender
|
Positvist theory
|
3 key assumptions of positivist theory
|
1. human behavior is deteredmined by psych, bio, or social foces that stop our rationality and free will
2. criminals are different from noncriminals 3. objective methods explain crime |
two examples of positivist theory
|
Eg. Franz Joseph Gall and Phrenology
eg. Cesare lobroso |
- he claimed to link character to brain parts
- mapped it on the brain - more pronounced part of the brain, will show those traits |
Franz Joseph and phrenology
|
- he thought criminals were identifed by physical abnormalities that tended to distinguish them from non-criminals
|
Cesare Lombroso
|