Front | Back |
Sutton v. United Airlines
|
Sutton twins forbidden from being pilots due to myopia.
7-2 ruling for United Airlines. ADA does not apply to correctable disabilities. |
UC Davis v. Bakke
|
Affirmative action. Court ruled 5-4 for Bakke.
Affirmative action remained constitutional, but race quotes are not constitutional. |
Gregg v. Georgia
|
Gregg murdered two people and was condemned to death.
8th Amendment (cruel & unusual punishment). 7-2 in favour of Georgia. Majority opinion - death penality is not cruel & unusual. Reaffirms acceptance of death penalty. |
Lemon v. Kurtzman
|
Pennsylvania/Rhode Island established statutes providing funding to church schools.
1st Amendment (Establishment clause) Unanimously ruled statutes unconstitutional. Precedent -- Lemon Test, which allows Court to decide if religion/government are 'separate' enough. |
Tinker v. Des Moines
|
Tinkers wore armbands protesting Vietnam War (symbolic speech)
Does 1st amendment protect symbolic speech in schools? 7-2 for Tinker Majority - Schools need a valid reason to ban something Precedent -- Symbolic speech protected in schools. |
Miranda v. Arizona
|
Miranda charged with rape/kidnapping; confessed, but interrogators did not inform him of his rights.
5th/6th Amendments 5-4 in favour of Miranda Precedent -- Miranda Rights -- right to remain silent, right to attorney; police must inform people of rights before custody |
Gideon v. Wainright
|
Gideon couldn't afford a lawyer and was denied a state lawyer because he'd only committed a burglary.
6th Amendment is unclear - does it apply to the state? Unanimous in favour of Gideon. Majority -- 6th Amendment (due process/equal protection clauses) does apply to states. |
Escobedo v. Illinois
|
Escobedo repeatedly denied his requests to see his lawyer and was never informed of Constitutional rights. After being misled, he made an incriminating statement.
5th/6th Amendments 5-4 in favour of Escobedo Precedent -- Escobedo Rule -- criminal defendant has right to legal council once interrogation goes from general questioning to a specific, probable suspect. |
Engle v. Vitale
|
Complaint that a prayer to 'almighty god' contrary to beliefs.
1st Amendment (Establishment clause) 6-1 vote against prayer in public schools Majority - direct violation, NY is promoting a specific religion Dissenting -- not mandatory prayer |
Mapp v. Ohio
|
Police searched Mapp's house without warrant, and she was arrested for having lewd materials.
4th Amendment/14th (Due Process clause) 6-3 in favour of Mapp Majority -- evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in a state court Precedent -- Exclusionary rule -- states had to ignore evidence seized in violation of 4th Amendment. |
Griswold v. Connecticut
|
Griswold, director of Planned Parenthood, arrested for providing contraception.
14th Amendment 7-2 in favour of Griswold Majority -- Connecticut statutes invalidated by 14th Amendment. Dissenting -- No 'right to marital privacy' in the Constitution. (Griswold v. Connecticut later used in Roe v. Wade) |
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
|
Pennsylvania legislature requires informed consent, 24-hour waiting period, husband consent, and parental permission for minors before abortions.
5-4 in favour of upholding Roe v. Wade. Husband notification declared unconstitutional. Plurality opinion -- upheld essential parts of Roe v. Wade (stare decisis) Precedent -- strengthens Roe v. Wade and establishes standard for judging what an 'undue burden' is in abortion laws. |
Wallace v. Jaffree
|
Alabama permitted silence/prayer in schools
First Amendment (establishment clause); 14th Amendment (abridging privileges) 6-3 Jaffree, no prayer/Alabama laws unconstitutional Majority -- no right to restrict religion/1st Amendment rights; statutes must have a clear secular purpose Concurring -- 'endorsement test' -- do statutes endorse religion? |
Brandenburg v. Ohio
|
Brandenburg, KKK leader, made a speech using racist terms/making threats to government
1st Amendment free speech Precedents of Witney v. California, Dennis v. US -- no free speech if threat to government, safety, public Unanimous in favour of Brandenburg Concurring -- 'clear and present danger' should not stand in 1st Amendment |
Roe v. Wade
|
Roe wanted an abortion which was illegal in Texas
14th Amendment (states cannot deny equal laws); 9th Amendment (privacy) 7-2 for Roe -- 14th Amendment allows woman to choose for child State may regulate 2nd/3rd trimester abortions only as necessary Dissenting -- not in Constitution. |