Front | Back |
Donders
(1868), Dutch physician,
|
began the research that demonstrated the need for time for
the motor control system to prepare to produce an intended action
RT (reaction time) is the commonly used index of the
preparation time required to produce action
Based on findings showing that RT is influenced by many
performance situation and performer characteristics
|
Task and Situation Characteristics Influencing Preparation 9
|
1. Number of responses2. Predictability of the correct response chioce3. Influence of the probablity of pre cue correctness4. Stimulus- response compatibilty5. Foreperiod length regularity6. Movement comlexity7. Movement Accuracy8. Reptition of a movement9. Time between different responses to different signals
|
Number of response choices
|
Hick's law: RT
increases logarithmically as the number of stimulus-response choices increases
|
Predictability
of the correct response choice
|
If a number of possible responses exist, and one alternative
is more predictable than others
RT decreases as the predictability of the correct response
choice increases
|
Influence
of the probability of precue correctness
|
Precue = an advance indication that a specific upcoming
event will require a response
Faster RT if probability of precue correctness is higher
than if probabilities of possible choices are equally possible
Cost – benefit trade-off for biasing
|
Stimulus-response compatibility
|
RT
will be faster as the relationship between the stimulus characteristics and
their required response becomes more compatible
|
Stroop
effect
|
PINK PINK GREEN GREEN
|
Spatial arrangement of stimuli and their associated response
mechanisms
|
e.g., Stove top example –
|
Foreperiod length regularity
|
The time between Go and RT ..
RT increases/decreases as a function of the length and the
regularity of the length of the RT foreperiod
|
Movement complexity
|
RT increases as amount of complexity of the action increases
First
demonstrated by classic experiment by Henry and Rogers (1960
|
Movement accuracy
|
RT increases as movement accuracy demands of the action
increase
First demonstrated by
evaluating RT results for Fitts’ tapping tasks with different Indexes of
Difficulty (i.e. as MT increased, RT also increased)
|
Repetition
of a movement
|
Reaction time increases with repition
|
Time
between different responses to different signals
|
Relate to a situation in sports involving a “fake” movement
followed by the intended movement as the 2 stimuli and the other player’s
responses as the 2 responses
Delay of response to 2nd stimulus (signal) is called the
psychological refractory period (PRP)
|
Two
Performer Characteristics Influencing Preparation
|
Alertness of the performerAttention
focused on the signal vs. the movement
|
Alertness of the performer
|
Warning signal effect-
Foreperiod length effect- Optimal length 1-4 sec
Vigilance effects- Always impairs alertness longer than 4 sec
|