Front | Back |
Treatment of stuttering should emanate logically from what?
|
Theory (formal or informal) because multiple factors contribute to the disorder varying across clients
|
A number of theories originated from what?
|
Layperson or clinician hunches
|
If treatment works, what does not matter? (Van Riper)
|
Why (pragmatic approach)
|
An eclectic program represents what?
|
Different philosophies and methods
|
Why is having research support/ having a theoretical framework/ knowing why important?
|
It is difficult to provide clients with a rationale/ interferes with therapy.
|
The theory-therapy link is only as good as the ____
|
Therapy itself
|
What is the advantage of a theory-therapy linkage?
|
Provides the clinician with a frame of reference and a rationale for the therapeutic approach, an understanding of why specific procedures fail to occur, and a logical basis for sensible alternatives when progress fails to occur
|
The field suffers from large gaps in what?
|
Stuttering therapies and theories because of the narrowness of the theories
|
What does the weak theory-therapy connection in stuttering during the past 30 years reflect an absence of?
|
A strong theory accepted by scientists and understood by the public
|
The longer the stuttering history, the greater their _____
|
Experience with the disorder
|
There is substantial commonalities among all 3 age groups in respects to what?
|
General therapeutic aims for long-term goal (increased fluency, reduced severity in stuttering events, and improved emotional adjustment
|
Naturally fluent speech
|
Produced by speakers who feel, think, and behave like normally speaking individuals
|
What population is a complete cure realistic for?
|
Preschool
|
What does substantial improvement indicate?
|
That speech therapy can alter the brain activity of PWS
|
Deliberately fluent speech
|
Produced by the speaker who exercises a conscious mental and/or behavioral monitoring of speech that normally fluent speakers usually do not use
|