Front | Back |
1A
Equivocation |
The same term used in two or more different senses.
|
1B
Amphiboly |
Ambiguous word order or grammatical structure.
|
1C
Accent |
Ambiguous because of voice inflection, ironic or sarcastic tone or innuendo.
|
1D
Slanting |
A form of begging the question, using words that evaluate and describe at the same time-e.g. flexible or traditional-instead of proving that something is good or bad by argument, you already assume it from word choice.
|
1E
Slogans |
Slogans are fallacious when used as a substitute for an argument
|
1F
Hyperbole |
Exaggeration-making an absurd extension-e.g. "you need to clean your room." "oh, so you want be to be your slave."
|
1G
Straw Man |
Refuting an unfairly weak, stupid or ridiculous version of your opponent's idea instead of the more reasonable idea he actually holds.
|
2A
Ad hominem |
"Poisoning the well"-
Attacking the person instead of the issue "Tu queque"- Accusing your critic of the same thing he accuses you of instead of defending yourself. "The genetic fallacy"- Substituting a personal motive for a logical reason |
2B
Ad verecundiam |
"the appeal to reverence (for authority)"
Fallacious when the authority is irrelevant, unreliable, unnecessary, or when the appeal is dogmatic (claiming certainty). |
2C
Ad baculum |
"appeal to force"- to fear instead of reason
also the "appeal to desire"-its true because I want it to be true |
2D
Ad misericordiam |
"appeal to pity"-pity as a substitute for an argument
|
2E
Ad ignominiam |
"appeal to shame"-shame is subjective and diverts from objective truth, facts and evidence.
|
2F
Ad populum |
"appeal to the populance"-fallacy of believing or doing something (or convincing others) because it is popular; because everyone else does it
|
2G
Ad ignorantiam |
"appeal to ignorance"-arguing that an idea must be true because we do not know that it is not true. Ignorance can never be a reason because premises express knowledge-claims.
|
3A
Dicto Simpliciter |
Saying something is true simply, therefore it is true in a special case.
Applying a general principle to a special case without the needed qualification-ignores the facts about a special case that require the principle to be qualified |