1L Torts

43 cards   |   Total Attempts: 188
  

Cards In This Set

Front Back
Policy Goals of Torts
1) Deterrence
2) Administrability
3) Compensation
Injury
1) Physical injury to people
2) Injury to property
General/Unqualified Duty
A duty to use reasonable care under the circumstances with regard to the physical well-being of another. Reasonable Foreseeability. Foreseeable risks to foreseeable victims.
Privity Rule
Has to do with the nature of the relationship of the parties in a case. Winterbottom v. Wright (must be in a contract to sue for products that are not imminently dangerous).
MacPherson case
Cardozo expands the Thomas definition of imminently dangerous from just a few products to include all objects that are imperfectly constructed. Makes Privity Rule no longer relevant.
Qualified Duty of Care
1) Affirmative Duty to Warn, Rescue or Protect
2) Premises Liability
3) Pure Economic Loss
Affirmative Duty to Warn, Rescue or Protect
1) misfeasance
2) nonfeasance
EXCEPTIONS:
1) Special Relationships
2) D created the peril to plaintiff
3) Voluntary Undertaking (D is trying to help protect)
If a duty exists...we balance three factors
1) relationship between the parties
2) reasonable foreseeability of harm to persons injured
3) public policy concerns
Premises Liability...traditional catagories
1) invitee-business purpose or mutual benefit of both parties.
2) licensee- social guest on site for their own benefit
3) trespasser-no permission to be on property.
Duties owed to premises liability traditional catagories
1) invitee-must keep premises in reasonably safe conditions.
2) licensee-warn of any known hidden dangers
3) trespasser-generally no duty, but need to refrain from willfully or wantonly injuring.
Pure Economic Loss
Generally, no duty when dealing with the loss of potential income.
Exceptions to the General Rule of No Duty in Pure Economic Loss
Special Foreseeability Rules:
1) Special Relationships
2) Some Type of Contract in Place
3) Proximity
Rowland Case
No longer embraces the traditional catagories of premises liability. Classifications do not negate the importance of all people's safety. People don't vary their behavior based on classifications.
Attractive Nuisance Doctrine (exception to trespasser rule)
Old Rule: an obligation not to have an attractive nuisance on one's land (children).
New Rule: if you can reasonably foresee a child will wander onto your property, you need to take reasonable precautions to protect them from harm (fence around a swimming pool).
Breach of Duty (Reasonable Care Under the Circumstances)
1) General-Robust Objective Standard
2) Tailored